Integration of Classical Islamic Scholarly Traditions and Modern Knowledge in the Educational Model of Gaziosmanpaşa Ortaokul Erkek Öğrenci Yurdu, Türkiy

Authors

  • Sultan Ageng Pradana Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
  • Asrori Asrori Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-3041
  • Yunus Cıbız Gaziosmanpaşa Ortaokul Erkek Öğrenci Yurdu, Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7401/ys3v4470

Keywords:

Islamic education, Classical Islamic scholarship, Modern knowledge, educational integration, Residential education in Türkiye

Abstract

Research Objective— This study aims to investigate the integration of classical Islamic scholarly traditions and modern knowledge within the educational model of Gaziosmanpaşa Ortaokul Erkek Öğrenci Yurdu, Türkiye. It further explores the educational mechanisms that facilitate this integration and examines its implications for students’ intellectual, moral, spiritual, academic, and social development. Methodology— The study employed a qualitative case study approach to obtain an in-depth understanding of educational practices within a residential learning environment. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with administrators, educational coordinators, mentors, tutors, and students, supported by participant observation and document analysis. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring themes and patterns related to educational integration and student development. Findings— The findings reveal that the institution successfully integrates classical Islamic sciences, including Qur’anic studies, fiqh, aqidah, Arabic linguistic sciences, logic, and tasawuf, with modern educational elements such as academic support programs, critical-thinking development, multilingual education, digital literacy, collaborative learning, and independent study practices. This integration is facilitated through a holistic educational philosophy, mentorship-based guidance, a residential learning environment, structured daily schedules, institutional leadership, and character education. As a result, students develop balanced competencies encompassing intellectual capability, academic achievement, moral integrity, spiritual awareness, social responsibility, leadership skills, and self-regulated learning. Research Implications/Limitations— The study demonstrates that integrated educational ecosystems can effectively bridge the divide between religious and secular education. Nevertheless, the findings are limited to a single institutional case and may not be fully generalizable to other educational contexts. Originality/Value— This research contributes to the literature on Islamic education by proposing an ecosystem-based model of integration that harmonizes Islamic intellectual heritage with contemporary educational demands, offering a practical framework for holistic student development in modern Islamic educational institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akcay, B., & Benek, İ. (2024). Problem-based learning in Türkiye: A systematic literature review of research in science education. Education Sciences, 14(3), Article 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030330

Aktan, S. (2018). Islamic civilization and its classical curriculum theory: The philosophy, institutions and important theoreticians of classical curriculum theory. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum Studies Worldwide (pp. 1–43). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53538-2_1

Aşcı, M., & Kaplan, H. (2026). An examination of universal values: Kari Nizâmüddin Bin Mulla Huseyin's work entitled Science of Morality (İlm-i Ahlak). Osmanli Mirasi Arastirmalari Dergisi, 13(35), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.17822/omad.133509

Bakhtiar, N., Arifin, Z., Afrida, Islami, N. K., & Thahir, M. (2025). Structural constraints in the implementation of child-friendly education in Islamic boarding schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 22(2), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v22i2.12174

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chong, S. S.-C., & Leung, K.-W. (2012). Challenges and management frameworks of residential schools for students with severe emotional and behavioural difficulties in Hong Kong. British Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2012.00533.x

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Ćukušić, M., Granić, A., Mifsud, C., & Zammit, M. (2008). A best practice approach to the enhancement of the learning experience. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on e-Learning (ECEL 2008) (Vol. 1, pp. 253–263).

Darwanto, A., Prahmana, R. C. I., Susanti, A., & Khalil, I. A. (2024). Transformation of boarding school management models in enhancing student accessibility and educational quality. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.8632

Dincer, A., Yeşilyurt, S., Noels, K. A., & Vargas Lascano, D. I. (2019). Self-determination and classroom engagement of EFL learners: A mixed-methods study of the self-system model of motivational development. SAGE Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853913

Dulun, Ö., & Lane, J. F. (2023). Supporting critical thinking skills needed for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme: A content analysis of a national and two international education programs in Turkey. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, Article 101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101211

Eren, Ö. (2023). Negotiating pre-service EFL teachers’ identity orientations through telecollaboration. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2085280

Günther, S. (2009). The principles of instruction are the grounds of our knowledge: Al-Fārābī’s philosophical and al-Ghazālī’s spiritual approaches to learning. In Trajectories of Education in the Arab World: Legacies and Challenges (pp. 15–35). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873755-9

Hashim, M., Jaafar, N., Muhammad, N. A. F., Yusof, A. M., Mohd. Raus, N., & Azmi, A. S. (2019). Bloom's taxonomy and its application in USIM's iNaQ model. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6 Special Issue 3), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.35940/IJEAT.F1054.0986S319

Huda, M., Selamat, A. Z., & Salem, S. (2024). Investigating respect in learning as character education: A review of al-Zarnūjī’s Ta‘līm al-Muta‘allim. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i2.4187

Ichsan, Y., Syamsudin, S., Nuryana, Z., & Sukiman. (2024). Realizing Islamic education based on religious moderation with the Wasathiyah Islamic paradigm from the perspective of the Qur'an. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.9944

Koç, A. (2025). Religious and pedagogical education in theology faculties in Türkiye in their 100th year: A comparative analysis with similar programs in the world. Religions, 16(1), Article 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010049

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.

Rokhimawan, M. A., Ichsan, I., Aulia, M. G., & Rifai, I. (2025). Integrating differentiated learning and interdisciplinary approaches in curriculum design for quality education: A case study in Islamic universities. Ulumuna, 29(1), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v29i1.1460

Semerci, N. (2006). The effect of problem-based learning on the critical thinking of students in the intellectual and ethical development unit. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(9), 1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.9.1127

Shafwan, M. H., & Asrori, A. (2026). Implementation of the Al-Salaf al-Ṣāliḥ curriculum and santri religious attitudes in pesantren. At-Ta’dib, 20(2), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.21111/attadib.v20i2.14909

Shaleh, M., Tobroni, Mundir, & Umiarso. (2024). Development of a holistic-integrative Islamic religious education curriculum in an integrated Islamic school. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2024(113), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2024.113.13

Sidik, M. F., Vachruddin, V. P., Rusydiyah, E. F., Pertiwi, A. S., & Darmawan, M. A. (2024). Conceptualization of the integrated Islamic religious education curriculum: A literature study at Imam Hatip Schools Turkey and MAN Insan Cendekia Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7617

Suciati, R., Gofur, A., Susilo, H., & Lestari, U. (2022). Development of textbook integrated of metacognition, critical thinking, Islamic values, and character. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(4), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.04.03

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Pradana, Sultan Ageng, Asrori Asrori, and Yunus Cıbız. 2026. “Integration of Classical Islamic Scholarly Traditions and Modern Knowledge in the Educational Model of Gaziosmanpaşa Ortaokul Erkek Öğrenci Yurdu, Türkiy”. Ar-Fachruddin: Journal of Islamic Education 3 (1): 58-80. https://doi.org/10.7401/ys3v4470.

Similar Articles

21-28 of 28

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.