Analysis of Class X MAN Surabaya Students' Mistakes in Solving Function Questions Quadratics Based on Learning Styles and Newman Procedures

Authors

  • Citra Aliffadya Pramesti Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
  • Shoffan Shoffa Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1582-4438
  • Sandha Soemantri Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.72204/3e8ha171

Keywords:

Teacher Competency, Differentiated Learning

Abstract

This qualitative descriptive research aims to examine the errors students make when solving quadratic function problems, focusing on their learning styles and the Newman procedure. The study targeted grade X-H students of MAN Surabaya, selected through purposive sampling. The research employed learning style questionnaires, math tests, and interview guidelines as instruments. The findings revealed five stages of errors in solving the test based on Newman's procedural error analysis, with the following contributing factors: (a) Reading errors: Students often rush and are careless when reading questions, a tendency seen in those with auditory and kinesthetics learning styles; (b) Misunderstanding: Students fail to accurately identify what is given and what is asked due to prior mistakes, commonly observed in auditory and kinesthetics learners; (c) Transformation errors: Students struggle to understand the material and misuse formulas, frequently occurring among kinesthetics learners; (d) Process skill errors: Mistakes in applying steps to use formulas correctly, often stemming from earlier errors, observed across auditory, visual, and kinesthetics learners; and (e) Final answer errors: Mistakes in writing results, influenced by prior errors, also affecting auditory, visual, and kinesthetics learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Faiz, M. (2021). Belajar itu: Bagaimana mengetahui gaya belajar anda? El Markazi.

Fazzilah, E., Effendi, K. N. S., & Marlina, R. (2020). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pisa konten uncertainty dan data. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 1034–1043.

Festiawan, R. (2020). Belajar dan pendekatan pembelajaran. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, 11.

Holisin, I., & Shoffa, S. (2023). Analysis of students’ errors in solving differential problems based on Castolan Theory. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 587–598.

Kamarullah, K. (2019). Analisis kesalahan guru matematika madrasah ibtidaiyah aceh besar terhadap geometri. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.32505/qalasadi.v3i1.902

Kristanti, F., Soemantri, S., & Murdiyani, H. (2020). Pelatihan konsep berhitung anak berbantukan media green mata (maket matematika) bagi guru SD/MI di era new normal.

Laila, A. F. (2023). Pengaruh penerapan metode writing in here and now terhadap hasil belajar alqur’an hadits siswa SMP Swasta Yayasan Perguruan Utama Medan. Jurnal Manajemen Akuntansi (JUMSI), 3(4).

Rahma, A. F., & Khabibah, S. (2022). Analisis kesalahan siswa sma dalam menyelesaikan soal eksponen. MATHEdunesa, 11(2), 446–457.

Rizayana Afifa, Holisin Iis, & Shoffa Shoffan. (2024). View of the influence of learning style and learning facilities on mathematics learning achievement in grade vii middle schools in the city of Surabaya in the pandemic era. JOELI: Journal of Educational and Learning Innovation, 1(1), 85–92.

Rohmah, S. N. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. UAD PRESS.

Syafitri Z, V. R., Kamid, K., & Maison, M. (2021). Analisis kesalahan penalaran analogi siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika dengan menggunakan prosedur newman ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.1002

Downloads

Published

2025-01-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pramesti, C. A., Shoffa, S., & Soemantri, S. (2025). Analysis of Class X MAN Surabaya Students’ Mistakes in Solving Function Questions Quadratics Based on Learning Styles and Newman Procedures. JOELI: Journal of Educational and Learning Innovation, 1(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.72204/3e8ha171